Insider - For the latest job hunting and recruitment news and views

Is Your Application Process Preventing You From Hiring the Best Talent?

Today we have a guest blog post from Katrina Collier of recruitment transformation consultancy Winning Impression. Here she looks at a key area of the recruitment cycle that is often overlooked.

“Through the cries of high unemployment can be heard the complaints of companies struggling to hire quality talent, which seems strange until you hear how they sabotage themselves with convoluted application systems.

On Facebook, I read about Kris, a dynamic publisher, who was trying to apply for a role in the public sector role and though she expected a long-winded process she gave up for several reasons:

  • The online form involved no less than 11 separate steps – the first of which asked for current details but did not allow for someone who wasn’t currently working.
  • She was asked to complete 2 separate 750-word essays but the two links to the attachments explaining what was required did not work!
  • She had to list no less than 3 referees, which seems rather irrelevant when fear of litigation keeps many from being honest, and
  • The thing that made her give up… the role was advertised at £55k but on application was listed as £40k, so she decided that if the publishing department could not publish an advert correctly, goodness knows what they’d be like to work for.

 

On Twitter, I also saw tweets from Gary complaining about the application process of a leading aerospace company and he should know what makes a good one, he is a talented Head of Resourcing.

  • He thought the process was not thought through, he could not upload his CV and there was a low word limit if you decided to write out your experience, and
  • He found the US focused questions off putting and did not feel that there was a need for such a cumbersome and antique mechanism

 

Unlike Kris, Gary decided to track down the person that posted the role, call in for the email address and send his CV by email, but few can be bothered.

It seems that candidates want a simple application process and as few clicks as possible to complete the process and companies want to attract top quality talent.

It was with this in mind that Manchester based digital agency Volcanic set about building a new site for Quest Search & Selection that would increase their candidate engagement. Chatting to Volcanic’s Technical Director, Robert Wilde, reveals a techie with a deep understanding of the recruitment process and what makes a great application process.

So why is their new site so special?

“We believe that Quest is the only UK recruitment agency to allow applicants to use their LinkedIn profile to apply. In itself brilliant but it also solves the issue of candidates completing a job application on their smart phone. Currently it is not possible to upload a CV on a mobile website and with mobile web browsing expected to outstrip PC based browsing by 2013, this work around is a great breakthrough. Behind the scenes the applicant’s LinkedIn profile is transferred to a PDF and stored on Quest’s database, as a CV would be.”

Volcanic also enhanced the applicant experience by taking their LinkedIn data and automatically creating job searches, based on their last 3 roles, and establishing weekly job alerts. The technology behind the alerts ensures applicants only receive notification of new roles not old ones. They also ensured that the search function was natural i.e. it allowed for common spelling mistakes. The clever use of tailored shareable permalinks has also improved the site’s SEO increasing traffic and applications.

But did they increase engagement?

“On the day Quest’s new website launched they received 350 LinkedIn registrations by midday, today it has nearly 2500. More applicants are choosing this method than the traditional CV upload route. Their bounce rate has reduced and the average number of page views per visitor has increased. So yes, applicants are staying longer and applying for more roles.”

So clearly it’s not lack of technology that’s creating these over complicated systems. Maybe recruiters just need to take a step back and look at their application system from the viewpoint of a candidate.

What about you, what are the worst systems you’ve come across in your job search? Did you find a way around or simply give up?”

 

Katrina Collier, of Winning Impression, uses her knowledge and passion for social recruitment to transform the experience of companies who are struggling to hire the best talent and candidates who are looking for alternative job searching methods. She also offers Job seekers personalised training on social media and how to find the hidden jobs by using appropriate and effective networking.

 

Related posts:

  1. Is Your Body Language Putting Off the Best Talent? Many businesses are finding it hard to recruit the talent...
  2. 14 Key Interview Questions to ask if you’re Hiring for Organisational Fit We recently published a guest blog from HR and Talent...
  3. How to Talk About Salary Demands During the Recruitment Process   The corporate winners of the Jobsite sponsored UK Recruitment...
  4. 5 Questions if You’re Hiring for Jobs That Didn’t Exist 10 Years Ago A recent article on Forbes, the leading US site for...
  5. Are We Really in the Talent Acquisition Business? When we announced Jason Lauritsen as a guest track leader...
| More
  • http://www.msbexecutive.com Lois Ireson

    Fantastic points here Katrina. The best candidates are often busy – it would be shame for a hiring process to be so slow that they are snapped up elsewhere. The application is the first part of the interview and if it makes a company look overly bureaucratic it will certainly, like some of your examples, make a candidate think a company is not for them. 

    • http://twitter.com/winningimpress Katrina Collier

      Thanks Lois, I totally agree!

    • http://twitter.com/winningimpress Katrina Collier

      Thanks Lois, I totally agree!

  • http://twitter.com/DavidJohnston1 David Johnston

    Really interesting blog and to be honest not something which is new. 10 years ago recruitment agencies had similar negative opinions. When I surveyed our applicants before a website overhaul, they said, please keep it simple, but the management wanted data so we came up with a compromise.

    In 2003-4 CV parsing tools came on the scene, such as Daxtra and Burning Glass. Immediately we could reduce application to email address password and upload CV. If needed a candidate could then verify (update their details) online. In essence this is the same process used with the LinkedIn data import, they work in the same manner. remember you can parse your CV into LinkedIn in the first place.

    CV parsing has typically been focussed at recruiters in the past, as well as some job boards, but if more ATS suppliers have APIs for both LI and CV parsing the recruitment application via web or mobile becomes a breeze.

    As mentioned this technology is nothing new for recruitment agencies, but requires the back office technology supplier to provide the integration. I n terms of time savings, when I first analysed this it saved on average 20 minutes per application.

    DJ

    • http://twitter.com/winningimpress Katrina Collier

       Thanks for your comments David. You make an interesting point.

  • Webfix

    Very good post, Katrina. Too many of these employers now ARE making the online recruitment process extremely convoluted and lengthy. And some of the questions they ask you in these accrused forms are just plain crazy! The big retail chains are especially guilty of such annoying practices, forcing you to complete page after page of situational based questions which, at the end of the day, don’t really give an accurate picture of the applicant’s personality. These ridiculous tests should be scrapped, and the government should introduce legislation to ensure that these firms make it much easier for the applicant to apply for their vacancies. The current system is just ludicrous!

    • http://twitter.com/winningimpress Katrina Collier

       Thank you for your input Webfix.

  • Andy

    I had 11 interviews with Microsoft for three seperate jobs and the process lasted nearly 4 months, 5 of those interviews were for one job were all held on one day. To my surprise they all asked exactly the same questions and between each interview I was constantly taken out of the room and escorted back downstairs to reception which was a massive waste of time.

    I was kept waiting for the final decision when the HR manager decided to go on holiday once they’d chosen the final candidate to offer the job to, it wasn’t until I phoned them to follow up that I got feedback and the bad news. Some of the larger employers you think would have a more effecient process are some of the worst when it comes to applying for a job. There’s being thorough which is one thing but long drawn out processes which are of no benefit to the candiate reveal some real flaws.

    • http://twitter.com/winningimpress Katrina Collier

      Andy I am so sorry you went through that (and that I have only just seen your comment!) Where did you end up, a smaller firm?

Disclaimer: Any views here do not necessarily reflect the views of Jobsite. As such we cannot be held responsible for the views expressed here or any actions taken as a consequence.