Insider - For the latest job hunting and recruitment news and views

CVs: Attention to Detail

Only 6% of CVs contain no spelling or grammatical mistakes, which means for every job advertised, only a handful of applicants will make it past the first hurdle. Now, more than ever, it’s so important to get your spelling and grammar right when you make a job application if you want a chance of getting your foot in the door.

Are you highly adept at ‘multi-tasting’? Perhaps you are a ‘prooficient typist’? Or does your role involve ‘coaching and mentioning’? It’s hard to imagine, but these are just a few of the mistakes that Corinne Mills, MD of Personal Career Management and author of “You’re Hired!  How to write a brilliant CV!”, has come across in her 12 years as a career coach.

In fact, Corinne was so appalled at the standard of spelling and grammar in the applications that she saw that her company carried out a survey, looking at 450 CVs in detail. Out of these, 94% had errors in spelling, grammar, poor visual presentation or content.

You may be thinking, what does it matter if I can’t spell properly, when I have all the relevant qualifications to do the job advertised? Well, think again. “CVs that have errors on them are far less likely to get shortlisted,” says Corinne. “In a competitive job market, where employers are spoilt for choice, rejecting CVs with errors provides an easy way to whittle down applications. Why should employers hire someone whose CV shows carelessness or poor attention to detail, when these are precisely the qualities that most employers look for in their staff?”

Regardless of how suited you are to the job, a CV that contains errors will be viewed as unprofessional. Employers want to hire staff who show pride in their work and who can work accurately to quality standards. If your CV shows that you are unable to do this, then they are likely to judge that you will adopt the same slapdash approach if you’re working for them.

Phillip Hodson, MD of Kensington Consulting, a recruitment agency for the engineering and manufacturing industry,  agrees. “Your CV is the number one document that can open a door into a business, and so first impressions count. If your CV or application letter has mistakes, it’s very telling to an employer. If you haven’t taken the time to proofread your application, a prospective employer might well question the standard of work you’re going to produce.”

Of course, not everyone has a degree in English language, but that’s not really the issue here – it’s all about attitude – taking the time and effort to proofread and double-check your applications. Even if English is not your first language or if you suffer from dyslexia, there’s no excuse – you can always find someone to help with your applications.

“If you have genuine problems with spelling or grammar then it makes sense to apply for roles where this is less likely to be an issue,” advises Corinne. “If your dyslexia is a disability, then you can also disclose this to an employer who may make allowances, depending on the role. Even if English isn’t your first language, your CV should be thoroughly checked for errors before sending it off.  Ask someone you know with excellent written English to check it for you.”

Even more worrying are candidates who misspell industry-specific terms. A regular mistake seen at Kensington Consulting is the word kaizen spelt wrongly. “Kaizen is a recognised term in manufacture engineering,” says Phillip. “It’s a Japanese word that means continuous improvement and it’s quite an achievement for candidates to adopt the kaisen methodology. And yet so many of our candidates spell it wrongly. This gives them a real disadvantage because employers will then question the validity of their achievement.”

Another problem area is where candidates don’t fully understand their computer software. Phillip has received a number of application letters and CVs that have been written and rewritten in Microsoft Word, but the candidate has not saved the final version correctly and the document is unfinished. If this went straight to an employer, the candidate would be instantly dismissed, and yet just five minutes spent double-checking would make all the difference.

The interesting thing is that these mistakes are not creeping in just at junior level. There are CEOs and other highly professional candidates who are spoiling their chances of recruitment because they haven’t proofread their applications. If you lack confidence in your English language, a career coach, or a recruitment agency can help make sure your application is properly written so that not only is the language and grammar correct, but that the content presents the professional image that you want to convey.

For more career coaching advice, you can contact Corinne Mills at www.personalcareermanagement.com or to have your CV checked professionally for free visit Jobsite’s CV partner CV Checker.

For jobs in the engineering and manufacturing industries, contact Kensington Consulting at www.kensingtonconsulting.co.uk or visit jobsite at www.jobsite.co.uk.

Related posts:

  1. Appearance : It’s all in the detail We all do it. Sometimes it can be positive and...
  2. Gain your boss’s attention and support Your boss is the person who can shape your future...
| More
  • david

    i have worked for local authority for 25 years and apply for jobs in the same sector but from 2008 when ibecame 50 i have not been shortlisted.
    i believe i have a good cv and work record or is it just thier are more people chasing fewer jobs

  • Amy

    Hi there, I believe my CV is full of all vital relevant information that shows I am more than capable of fulfilling the jobs I apply for, however when you try to explain you have raised a family for the last 3 years employers seem to cast a dim view of your achievements over their faces and yo automatically seem to fall into the un-suitable category. I did successfully achieve a BA and teaching qualification whist raising 2 small children. Employers need to be a little more aware of house persons seeking re entry into employment

  • Hari

    David, I sympathize, truly. I am personally very worried about exactly this same problem of ageism.

    Especially as the world is becoming more and more overpopulated, employers simply don’t need to take anyone who isn’t in their eyes perfect. Too old, too qualified, missed one qualification, doesn’t have a useless degree, got degree from a uni I don’t like, blah blah blah.

    I think fixing the overpopulation problem would go a long way to stopping things from turning into a pressure cooker which is the way it seems to be going (and fix half the other problems on the planet)

  • Vera

    It is not just on CVs. Applying for PA jobs and viewing some of the job descriptions and person specifications, which all state attention to detail, spelling and grammar are essential, I am shocked to find that these very documents are riddled with errors. Lead by example, comes to mind.

    Also did Amy, who claims a BA and teaching qualification, proof read her comment?

  • Ava

    David, I very much sympathise with that very statement, it is exactly what you have said and I myself have experienced that. I also am concerned about what Hari says. Ageism very much comes into play but is not admitted to you, so, what does discrimination really cover?

    I have been unemployed for quite some time and have sent my cv at the first instance of being redundant to a couple agencys and had asked them to please advise me of anything that needs to be modified, removed and of course errors. Only one agency had taken the time to advise. I had also bought a book on ‘How to produce a brillian cv’ and helped a lot.
    In this economic climate, there are fewer jobs, and like David mensioned, I also worked for a Local Authority for quite some time and I signed up immediately with their agencys and others, and have done all the things the book tells you to do and have still not heard much from them. I have also applied to several local Authorities and only have been shortlisted for one job and was un-successful. I have had four interviews in the time I have been unemployed, three by the agency and one through local Authority, shortlisted through an application.
    I believe that agencys should help a little more by advising their clients on their books about the cv they have produced free of charge as I beleive recruitment should cover this. Not all unemployed people can afford to pay for a brilliant cv.

  • Nko

    It is truly interesting to read the comments posted in reply to this article. I have already identified at least 4 grammatical and spelling errors!
    The article itself is an eye-opener. I have to go back and proof-read my own CV…
    I would say: Guys, stop arguing about discrimination. Your comments have errors, how much more your CVs? Go back, check and correct them, then apply again. You never know, it might make a difference!

  • Peter Gary

    I don’t know what I am doing out of bed!

  • Anne Marie

    I have Dyslexia, and being 50, my CV is good enough, I DO NOT think that being unable to find a job is just down to the CV, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE AGE, people DO not want to take you on because youwould only provide the company with the least 15 years of your employment, they would rather employ younger people, more years left for the company to get as much from you as possible. SO YES when your 50 forget it, no one wants you.

  • Anne

    I am also surprised and concerned about the number of errors on job descriptions and person specifications. I consider myself to have good attention to detail and always try to show this on my CV and job applications etc. However I am not sure that this always affects the way the application is viewed by the recruiters, even if they do say that a good attention to detail is a key skill !

  • Mike

    To the “ageism” people – at nearly 35, I count myself lucky at the moment if I get an acknowledgement of application – never mind an interview or offer…. Even enquiring for further information on posts that display insufficient detail most often sees no reply!

    At the moment, there are too many people chasing too few jobs – it’s as simple as that. Yes, age may be a factor, but it might well be something else. If an employer received 30 applications for a post, and in the first 10 applications they find 5 people that they will interview, the other 20 often won’t even be looked at – this is from someone I know who works in HR at a well-known telecoms company. Juggle the numbers as needed, these are illustrative to make a point.
    Don’t necessarily put it down to one thing, it may be something completely different and unrelated. All you can do is try to make sure that if you ARE lucky enough to be one of the 10 that gets read (continuing my example above), then all the areas that are within your control are as good as they can be.

    Good luck to all hunters…

  • Melanie

    I most certainly agree with your comment about the vital importance of paying attention to detail in your CV. I only wish that Recruitment Agencies would show the same level of care that candidates are expected to; when they are putting together job descriptions and person specifications. Very common, inexcusable errors include: the wrong use of stationery and stationary or the incorrect spelling of accommodation or principle and principal.

  • Nick

    Not surprisingly, most people make valid points. Being over 50 years of age certainly doesn’t help one iota. Spelling, grammar and software type errors also don’t help. The major problem however is undoubtedly too few jobs and too many people chasing those jobs. This situation is further exacerbated by the recruitment industry not having the decency to let applicants know whether they are considered suitable or not. Indeed, as one writer said one is lucky to receive any form of further correspondence let alone a rejection email. A pretty shabby state of affairs all things considered. One day it would be nice to see what the reaction of some of these recruiters would be if it happened to them.

  • Literat

    mmm…article is entitled CVs: Attention to Detail but misses an important detail itself:

    the article states: “Only 6% of CVs contain no spelling or grammatical mistakes”
    What it meant to say was that “Only 6% of CVs contain no spelling, grammatical mistakes OR had any problems with visual presentation or content”.
    Which could mean a completely different thing.

    It may be that Corinne Mills looked at 450 CVs and found no spelling or grammatical mistakes whatsoever, only problems with visual presentation.

Disclaimer: Any views here do not necessarily reflect the views of Jobsite. As such we cannot be held responsible for the views expressed here or any actions taken as a consequence.